LaborCove Insight

Top Metros for General and Operations Managers in 2026: New York Leads on Scale While Trenton and San Jose Top Pay

Published September 14, 2026

This Insight looks at where general and operations managers may want to focus if they are comparing major U.S. metro areas in 2026. LaborCove analyzes labor‑market data to rank locations using median annual salary, employment levels, and a composite LaborCove Geography Score. For this occupation nationally, the median annual salary is $105,770 and employment is 3,503,020, with projected national employment growth of 4.4%. Against that backdrop, the top 10 metros in this ranking show distinct mixes of higher pay, larger employment counts, and different Geography Scores that can help frame relocation or job‑search decisions.
LaborCove Rankings

Top Metro Areas for General and operations managers

Compare leading metropolitan areas using LaborCove salary, employment and geographic opportunity data.

#1

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ

NY-NJ
LaborCove Score 81.5

Median Salary $157,000
Employment 177,850
#2

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV

DC-VA-MD-WV
LaborCove Score 65.4

Median Salary $156,460
Employment 112,530
#3

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA

CA
LaborCove Score 57.3

Median Salary $125,830
Employment 104,610
#4

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA

CA
LaborCove Score 56.8

Median Salary $163,860
Employment 17,230
#5

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA

CA
LaborCove Score 55.3

Median Salary $149,990
Employment 43,520
#6

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX

TX
LaborCove Score 55.0

Median Salary $111,010
Employment 125,090
#7

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN

IL-IN
LaborCove Score 53.8

Median Salary $109,390
Employment 122,930
#8

Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH

MA-NH
LaborCove Score 53.6

Median Salary $133,800
Employment 70,950
#9

Trenton-Princeton, NJ

NJ
LaborCove Score 52.7

Median Salary $181,450
Employment 3,100
#10

Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX

TX
LaborCove Score 51.5

Median Salary $119,600
Employment 97,320

What the Data Tells Us

Across these 10 metros, LaborCove’s data shows that no single market dominates on every measure at once. New York-Newark-Jersey City holds the top rank with the largest employment count and a Geography Score above 80, but San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara posts the highest median salary, and several other metros sit between those two on both pay and score. Nationally, general and operations managers see a projected 4.4% increase in employment, which provides context for understanding how sizable the metro employment numbers are relative to the nationwide total. The variety in median pay—ranging from $109,390 to $181,450 in this top‑10 set—highlights that even among leading metros, compensation and LaborCove Geography Scores do not move in lockstep, underscoring the importance of looking at all three metrics together rather than relying on a single headline figure.

How the top metros compare to national pay and employment

For general and operations managers as a whole, the national median annual salary is $105,770. Every metro in this top‑10 list has a higher median salary than that benchmark. Among them, Trenton-Princeton shows the highest median salary at $181,450, while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has the lowest median salary in this group at $109,390. On the employment side, national employment for this occupation is 3,503,020. Within that total, New York-Newark-Jersey City stands out in this ranking with 177,850 employed general and operations managers, which is the largest employment count among the top‑ranked metros and matches the largest employment market noted in the geographic data. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin follow with employment counts of 125,090 and 122,930, respectively, illustrating that several metros host six‑figure employment counts even though none approaches the national total on its own. The 4.4% projected employment growth applies to the occupation nationally and provides a directional context for the field overall. However, no metro‑specific projected growth rates are supplied, so this article uses the national growth rate strictly as context rather than as a measure of expected change for any individual metro area.

New York, Washington, and Los Angeles: large employment and high rankings

The three highest‑ranked metros—New York-Newark-Jersey City; Washington-Arlington-Alexandria; and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim—combine relatively high Geography Scores with some of the largest employment counts in this list. New York-Newark-Jersey City ranks #1 with a LaborCove Geography Score of 81.47, the highest among these metros. Its median annual salary of $157,000 is above the national median of $105,770 and also above the salaries in all other listed metros except San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara and Trenton-Princeton. With 177,850 employed general and operations managers, New York also has the largest employment count in the top‑10 ranking. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria holds Rank #2 with a Geography Score of 65.35 and a median salary of $156,460, which is higher than the national median and slightly lower than New York’s median salary. Its employment count of 112,530 is less than New York’s 177,850 but still above Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim’s 104,610. Los Angeles, at Rank #3 with a Geography Score of 57.30, offers a median salary of $125,830, which is higher than the national median but lower than both New York and Washington, while maintaining a six‑figure employment count within this group.

California’s contrasting metros: San Jose, San Francisco, and Los Angeles

Three California metros appear in the top 5: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, and San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont. They differ meaningfully on both salary and employment, despite all ranking within the top half of this list. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara holds Rank #4 with a Geography Score of 56.81 and has the highest median salary among the top 10 metros at $163,860. Its employment count of 17,230, however, is smaller than the employment counts in all other listed metros. In contrast, Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, ranked #3, has a lower median salary of $125,830 than San Jose but a much larger employment count of 104,610. San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, at Rank #5 with a Geography Score of 55.32, sits between these two on both salary and employment. Its median salary of $149,990 is lower than San Jose’s $163,860 but higher than Los Angeles’s $125,830. With 43,520 employed general and operations managers, San Francisco has more employment than San Jose’s 17,230 but fewer than Los Angeles’s 104,610, illustrating the variety of scale and pay even within a single state’s leading metros.

Texas and Chicago: sizable employment with more moderate salaries

Two of the remaining top‑10 metros—Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington and Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands—are in Texas, joined by Chicago-Naperville-Elgin in the Midwest. All three combine relatively large employment counts with median salaries that are above the national median but below the highest‑paying metros in this list. Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington ranks #6 with a Geography Score of 54.97. Its median salary of $111,010 is higher than the national median of $105,770 but lower than New York’s $157,000 and San Jose’s $163,860. Dallas’s employment count of 125,090 is greater than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin’s 122,930 and also greater than Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands’ 97,320. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, ranked #7 with a Geography Score of 53.79, has a median salary of $109,390. This is above the national median but lower than the salaries in all other metros on this list, making it the lowest median salary within the top‑10 group. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, at Rank #10 with a Geography Score of 51.51, offers a median salary of $119,600, which is higher than Chicago’s $109,390 but still below the salaries reported for New York, Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, and Trenton-Princeton.

Boston and Trenton: high salaries at smaller scales

Boston-Cambridge-Newton and Trenton-Princeton round out the top 10 with distinctive combinations of salary, score, and employment. Both have median salaries well above the national figure of $105,770, but their Geography Scores and employment counts differ. Boston-Cambridge-Newton ranks #8 with a Geography Score of 53.55 and a median salary of $133,800, which is higher than Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim’s $125,830 and higher than Chicago-Naperville-Elgin’s $109,390. Its employment count of 70,950 is less than New York’s 177,850 and less than Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington’s 125,090, but greater than San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara’s 17,230. Trenton-Princeton holds Rank #9 with a Geography Score of 52.74. It has the highest median salary in the top‑10 list at $181,450, which is higher than San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara’s $163,860 and higher than New York-Newark-Jersey City’s $157,000. At the same time, its employment count of 3,100 is smaller than the employment counts in all other listed metros, including San Jose’s 17,230, underscoring that the highest reported pay in this ranking coincides with the smallest employment count among these metros.
Explore the Career

Explore General and operations managers

Go beyond the article and explore LaborCove national salary, employment and projected growth, along with state and metro opportunity data for general and operations managers.

Continue Exploring

Related LaborCove Insights

Best States

Best States for General and Operations Managers in 2026

See how the top 10 states for general and operations managers in 2026 compare on salary, employment, growth, and LaborCove Geography Scores versus the national benchmarks.

Methodology

LaborCove builds these metro rankings for general and operations managers using authoritative labor‑market data combined with its proprietary LaborCove Geography Score. For each metro, we use the supplied median annual salary, employment count, and Geography Score for the 2026 report year. The Geography Score is a composite measure derived from LaborCove’s scoring methodology and is used here to order the top 10 metro areas, with Rank #1 representing the highest score in this set. Because the internal weighting of specific inputs to the Geography Score is not supplied, this article does not attribute a metro’s rank to any single factor. Nationally, we reference the median annual salary, employment, and projected employment growth rate for the occupation to give broader context, but we do not assign that national growth rate to any specific metro. Rankings and metrics in this Insight should be considered alongside personal factors such as role fit or preferred industries, which fall outside the scope of the LaborCove dataset used here.
← View All LaborCove Insights

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.