This Insight looks at where public relations managers are best positioned across major U.S. metro areas.
Using LaborCove’s metro-level rankings, median salaries, employment counts, and Geography Scores, we compare the top 10 metros for public relations managers against each other and against national benchmarks. The goal is to help you see how the leading markets differ in pay, scale, and overall ranking without predicting any individual job outcome.
LaborCove Rankings
Top Metro Areas for Public relations managers
Compare leading metropolitan areas
using LaborCove salary,
employment and geographic
opportunity data.
#1
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
DC-VA-MD-WV
LaborCove Score
78.8
Median Salary
$195,190
Employment
9,470
#2
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
NY-NJ
LaborCove Score
78.2
Median Salary
$192,360
Employment
7,940
#3
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
CA
LaborCove Score
61.8
Median Salary
$213,510
Employment
980
#4
Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
CO
LaborCove Score
58.9
Median Salary
$174,260
Employment
0
#5
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
CA
LaborCove Score
57.4
Median Salary
$192,720
Employment
1,880
#6
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
CA
LaborCove Score
54.2
Median Salary
$163,830
Employment
3,610
#7
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
MA-NH
LaborCove Score
51.3
Median Salary
$176,390
Employment
1,810
#8
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
WA
LaborCove Score
46.3
Median Salary
$166,590
Employment
1,110
#9
Trenton-Princeton, NJ
NJ
LaborCove Score
45.1
Median Salary
$179,330
Employment
430
#10
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
MI
LaborCove Score
43.7
Median Salary
$125,650
Employment
0
What the Data Tells Us
Across the top 10 metros for public relations managers, LaborCove’s data shows that no single market leads on every measure at once. Washington–Arlington–Alexandria takes the #1 overall metro ranking and has the largest supplied employment count, while San Jose delivers the highest supplied median salary but ranks #3 overall.
Compared with national benchmarks, several metros post substantially higher median salaries for public relations managers. At the same time, the distribution of employment counts among the largest metros highlights how concentrated the supplied jobs data is in a few very large markets.
Nationally, public relations managers have a projected employment growth rate of 5.0%. That projection provides national context for the occupation but does not indicate how fast employment may change in any specific metro in this ranking.
How the top metros compare with national pay and employment
For public relations managers nationally, the median annual salary is $146,910 and total national employment is 74,850. These benchmarks frame how the leading metros differ from the overall labor market for this occupation.
Among the top 10 metros, several have median salaries that exceed the national median. Washington–Arlington–Alexandria, the #1 metro, reports a median salary of $195,190 for public relations managers, while the #2 metro, New York–Newark–Jersey City, reports $192,360.
Employment for public relations managers is also uneven across the ranked metros. Washington–Arlington–Alexandria has a supplied employment count of 9,470, compared with 7,940 in New York–Newark–Jersey City and 3,610 in Los Angeles–Long Beach–Anaheim. Within this top‑10 set, Washington–Arlington–Alexandria’s employment figure matches the largest employment market value reported in the geographic data.
Why Washington and New York lead LaborCove’s metro rankings
Washington–Arlington–Alexandria holds the #1 spot in LaborCove’s metro ranking for public relations managers, with a Geography Score of 78.76. It also has a median salary of $195,190 and the highest supplied employment count in the table at 9,470.
New York–Newark–Jersey City ranks #2 with a Geography Score of 78.15. Its median salary of $192,360 is slightly lower than Washington–Arlington–Alexandria’s, and its employment count of 7,940 is also smaller than Washington–Arlington–Alexandria’s.
Both metros place ahead of the rest of the field in LaborCove’s Geography Score, with a notable gap between New York–Newark–Jersey City at 78.15 and San Jose–Sunnyvale–Santa Clara at 61.77 in the #3 position.
San Jose delivers the highest reported median salary but ranks #3 overall
San Jose–Sunnyvale–Santa Clara has the highest supplied median salary among the top 10 metros, at $213,510 for public relations managers. This is higher than the median salaries reported for Washington–Arlington–Alexandria ($195,190) and New York–Newark–Jersey City ($192,360).
Despite this pay level, San Jose–Sunnyvale–Santa Clara ranks #3 overall with a Geography Score of 61.77, which is lower than the Geography Scores for both Washington–Arlington–Alexandria and New York–Newark–Jersey City. Its supplied employment count of 980 is also smaller than the employment counts reported for those two metros.
This pattern illustrates that the highest median salary in the ranking does not automatically correspond to the highest LaborCove Geography Score or the largest supplied employment count.
Mid-ranked coastal metros: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, and Seattle
Four coastal metros occupy the #5 through #8 positions: San Francisco–Oakland–Fremont, Los Angeles–Long Beach–Anaheim, Boston–Cambridge–Newton, and Seattle–Tacoma–Bellevue.
San Francisco–Oakland–Fremont ranks #5 with a Geography Score of 57.42, a median salary of $192,720, and employment of 1,880. Among these four metros, its median salary is higher than the median salary reported for Los Angeles–Long Beach–Anaheim ($163,830), Boston–Cambridge–Newton ($176,390), and Seattle–Tacoma–Bellevue ($166,590).
Los Angeles–Long Beach–Anaheim, ranked #6 with a Geography Score of 54.18, reports the largest supplied employment count in this group at 3,610. Boston–Cambridge–Newton, at #7 with a Geography Score of 51.27, has employment of 1,810, while Seattle–Tacoma–Bellevue, at #8 with a Geography Score of 46.31, has employment of 1,110.
How Trenton and Detroit round out the top 10
Trenton–Princeton holds the #9 slot in LaborCove’s metro ranking with a Geography Score of 45.14. It has a median salary of $179,330 for public relations managers and a supplied employment count of 430.
Detroit–Warren–Dearborn ranks #10 with a Geography Score of 43.70. Its median salary of $125,650 is lower than the median salary reported for any other metro in the top 10 list. Employment is not supplied for Detroit–Warren–Dearborn in this dataset, so this Insight does not compare its employment count with those of other metros.
Within the bottom two positions of the top 10, Trenton–Princeton shows a higher median salary than Detroit–Warren–Dearborn and a Geography Score that is also higher than Detroit–Warren–Dearborn’s score.
Explore the Career
Explore Public relations managers
Go beyond the article and explore
LaborCove national salary,
employment and projected growth,
along with state and metro
opportunity data for
public relations managers.
Continue Exploring
Related LaborCove Insights
Best States
See how top states for public relations managers compare on salary, employment, and LaborCove Geography Scores, plus national pay and growth context for this role.
Methodology
LaborCove ranks metro areas for public relations managers using authoritative labor‑market data combined with its internal Geography Score methodology. For each metro, the evidence used in this Insight includes its overall LaborCove Geography Score, median annual salary for public relations managers, and the supplied employment count when available.
The national figures cited here (median annual salary of $146,910, national employment of 74,850, and a national projected employment growth rate of 5.0%) are national‑level occupation benchmarks. Projected growth is a national projection only and is not an OEWS observation or a metro‑level forecast.
Occupational employment and wage statistics in this Insight refer to observations from May 2025; the 2026 report year is the product year, not the observation year. Rankings and comparisons are informational and should be weighed alongside your own priorities such as industry focus, preferred region, and non‑labor factors that are not captured in this dataset.