LaborCove Insight

Best States for Truck Drivers in 2026: California Leads, Alaska Pays the Most

Published September 5, 2026

This Insight looks at where heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers are best positioned in 2026, based on LaborCove’s state rankings. Nationally, heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers have a median annual salary of $58,640 and employment of 2,062,040, with a projected national employment growth rate of 4.0%. LaborCove compares states using median salary, employment, and its Geography Score to highlight how top-ranked locations differ. These rankings summarize the available data; they do not predict any individual driver’s likelihood of finding a job.
LaborCove Rankings

Top States for Heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers

Compare the leading states using LaborCove salary, employment and geographic opportunity data.

#1

California

LaborCove Score 70.2

Median Salary $60,230
Employment 205,090
#2

Texas

LaborCove Score 61.2

Median Salary $56,290
Employment 209,680
#3

Alaska

LaborCove Score 53.4

Median Salary $70,100
Employment 3,420
#4

New York

LaborCove Score 51.6

Median Salary $62,050
Employment 63,700
#5

Washington

LaborCove Score 51.2

Median Salary $64,760
Employment 40,530
#6

New Jersey

LaborCove Score 50.6

Median Salary $63,570
Employment 47,980
#7

Massachusetts

LaborCove Score 48.5

Median Salary $63,030
Employment 30,890
#8

Ohio

LaborCove Score 47.8

Median Salary $59,800
Employment 83,060
#9

Pennsylvania

LaborCove Score 47.0

Median Salary $58,580
Employment 87,550
#10

Illinois

LaborCove Score 47.0

Median Salary $60,320
Employment 84,200

What the Data Tells Us

Across the top 10 states, LaborCove’s data shows clear differences in how salary levels, employment counts, and overall Geography Scores line up for heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers. Alaska has the highest median salary in this group, yet California holds the top overall ranking by Geography Score. Texas has the largest employment count among the listed states but ranks just behind California. Several top-10 states also sit above the national median salary, while others are close to it, illustrating that higher geography rankings do not always correspond to the very highest pay levels. National employment growth for the occupation provides overall context, but the state results here are based on salary, employment, and LaborCove’s scoring rather than any geographic growth projections.

How national truck-driving pay and growth frame the state rankings

At the national level in 2026, heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers have a median annual salary of $58,640 and total employment of 2,062,040. The occupation’s projected employment growth rate of 4.0% is likewise a national figure. This national salary benchmark helps put state results in context. Several of the top 10 states have median salaries above $58,640, while others are close to that national median. However, the national growth rate does not describe any individual state or metro; the state rankings here are built from salary, employment, and LaborCove Geography Scores rather than geographic growth projections.

Why California tops the LaborCove rankings

California ranks #1 among states in LaborCove’s results for heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers, with a Geography Score of 70.18. Its median annual salary of $60,230 is above the national median of $58,640, and its employment count of 205,090 is substantial within the top 10. Compared with Texas, which has the largest employment count in this group at 209,680, California has a slightly smaller employment count but a higher median salary and a higher Geography Score. Among the top 10, California’s Geography Score is the highest supplied value, and its employment count is among the largest, contributing to its position at the top of the ranking table.

Texas combines the highest employment with a strong overall ranking

Texas ranks #2 in the LaborCove state list for heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers, with a Geography Score of 61.23. Its employment count of 209,680 is the highest reported among the top 10 states, while its median salary of $56,290 is modestly below the national median of $58,640. Compared with California, Texas has a higher employment count but a lower median salary and a lower Geography Score. The contrast between these two leading states shows that a larger employment count does not automatically translate into the top Geography Score or the highest pay within the ranking.

High salaries do not always mean the highest ranking: the case of Alaska

Alaska ranks #3 on LaborCove’s list with a Geography Score of 53.44, but it has the highest median annual salary in the top 10 at $70,100. That salary is higher than both the national median of $58,640 and the median salaries in the other listed states. Alaska’s employment count is 3,420, which is smaller than the employment counts reported for the other top 10 states. For example, Ohio’s employment count is 83,060 and Pennsylvania’s is 87,550, both larger than Alaska’s. Alaska’s combination of the highest median salary and a relatively small employment count, alongside a Geography Score below California’s and Texas’s, illustrates that high pay alone does not determine a state’s overall ranking in the LaborCove results.

Mid-ranked states balancing pay and employment near the national benchmark

New York, Washington, New Jersey, and Massachusetts occupy ranks #4 through #7 and all show median salaries above the national median of $58,640. New York records a median salary of $62,050 and employment of 63,700. Washington has a median salary of $64,760 and employment of 40,530. New Jersey’s median salary is $63,570 with employment of 47,980, and Massachusetts shows a median salary of $63,030 with employment of 30,890. Their Geography Scores range from 48.53 in Massachusetts up to 51.61 in New York, all below California’s and Texas’s scores but above the scores of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois further down the top-10 list. These states combine salaries that exceed the national median with moderate employment counts and mid-range Geography Scores within the top 10.

How Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois close out the top 10

Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois round out the top 10, with Geography Scores of 47.85, 47.04, and 46.99 respectively. All three states have employment counts above 80,000: Ohio at 83,060, Pennsylvania at 87,550, and Illinois at 84,200. Their median salaries are close to or slightly above the national figure. Ohio’s median salary of $59,800 and Illinois’s median salary of $60,320 both exceed the national median of $58,640, while Pennsylvania’s median salary of $58,580 is slightly below the national median. Compared with the mid-ranked states like New York and Washington, these three have lower Geography Scores but relatively large employment counts within the top-10 group, highlighting another way that salary, employment, and Geography Score can differ across states.
Explore the Career

Explore Heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers

Go beyond the article and explore LaborCove national salary, employment and projected growth, along with state and metro opportunity data for heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers.

Methodology

LaborCove builds these rankings from authoritative labor-market data for heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers and applies its LaborCove Geography Score to summarize how each state compares on the supplied measures. For this article, we use national figures for median annual salary, employment, and projected employment growth as context, and state-level data on median salary, employment, and Geography Score for the top 10 ranked states. National projected employment growth is a single figure for the occupation across the country; it is not a state or metro growth rate. LaborCove’s Geography Score is a composite measure produced by LaborCove. The internal weighting of salary, employment, and other factors is not broken out in this dataset, so this article focuses on transparent, direct comparisons of the supplied values. Drivers should view these rankings as one input alongside their own priorities and circumstances, not as definitive prescriptions about where any specific person should work.
← View All LaborCove Insights

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.